QUOTE
The benefit system seems to work to your advantage if you've become diabled or had some kind of accident
Hi,
This subject drives me mad, John had an incomplete SCI at C5/6 lifting in work 8 years ago, to date he has not received a penny of benefits.
He has the attitude that men work and provide for as long as their are able, and has continued to work even during the most chronic pain, he just keeps taking tablets, then more tablets and even more tablets, so much so that he has damaged his liver, and now has to be monitored by blood tests regularly.

We applied for DLA years ago and he was turned down, we applied for Industrial Injuries Benefit and he was turned down as being less than 14% disabled. We appealled, his appeal went on whilst he was actually being operated on, because he had lost the use of his legs due to spasticity and tight tendons, his cord signals are all confused and he could not straighten his legs. Even though we wrote explaining this, still he was turned down. With the letters saying that this was a FINAL decision.
After seeing many different doctors over the past 8 years, one off them was refering to which rate of DLA John receives. We explained he did not receive anything and he wrote two very long detailed letters explaining the John was 66% disabled not including suffering of pain, we have sent off everything we can think of, details of AD, UTI's, Chronic Pain, details on various types of pain, plus Urology reports, Pain Management reports, Spinal Rehabilitation reports, etc etc, all expressing that John was under assessed by the Examining Medical Practioner working for the Benefit's Agency. It cost me over £8.00 to post it all and they have said that because it is more than 14 months, the previous claims do not count as they are out of time, and we have to fill it all in again.
So I'm in the process of filling in 39 pages of their booklets, repeating myself on nearly every page, pulling my hair out and feeling like screaming, SO NO IT IS NOT EASIER TO CLAIM IF YOU HAVE HAD AN ACCIDENT, OR AT LEAST IT HASN'T BEEN FOR US.
John is usually made to feel that because he has continued to work with the chronic pain, problems walking, problems with his arms, spasms etc etc, that he cannot be in as much pain or as disabled as he says he is, because he still works. One of the Benefit's Agencies doctors told him that he cannot have the problems with his legs that he says he has, because if he did he would use sticks or be in a wheelchair. They obviously have not heard of an incomplete injury and the various ways you can be affected.
Doesn't matter that Physio have told him not to use sticks or crutches because of his spasms and spasticity problems. Doesn't matter that he has tried to remain on his legs and walking for as long as he could, (he now has a wheelchair on order through NHS because he is really struggling to walk now), he is just told he cannot be as bad as he says he is.
So he obviously takes Oxycontin, Baclofen, Tramadol, Paracetamol, Amitriptyline, Diclofenac etc etc just for fun. He has spasms for fun, he uses a catheter for fun, I won't go on because I'm in danger of exploding.
I wish doctors and Benefit staff, solicitors and Barristers, Judges etc would read these forums and comments and then may be they would understand an incomplete SCI and treat people fairly. They might also realise that just because you want to work for a living, DOES NOT MEAN YOU ARE NOT IN PAIN.
Maria