City Girl
Aug 8 2008, 05:35 AM
I (T12 - 2007) was in the waiting room to see my physiatrist yesterday and was chatting with a gentleman (C5-6 - 1979) who was also waiting. Upon discussing our injuries, we exchanged on our fused vertebrae. I noted that although I'm fused from T10 through L3, I still have quite good range of motion in my back. I certainly cannot do back flips or bridges, but I am still able to pull off a reasonable facsimile to "the cobra" - a yoga pose. He, however, commented that my unfused vertebrae were doing double-time in order for me to accomplish that stretch and that the vertebrae were probably over-extending themselves, which could lead to break-down and problems in the future. I am actually planning to return to my former yoga class at my gym this fall in hopes of regaining my pre-SCI ROM (or at least attempt to) and was wondering if there is any truth to his claim? Has anyone who has been fused for a lengthy time had any issues with non-fused vertebrae as a consequence of having to over-extend them?
Kwag_Myers
Aug 8 2008, 10:49 AM
My Physiatrist cautioned me about this, too. The vertebra above and below your fusion have to over-extend to compensate for the lack of flexibility. They can see it in x-rays - I think the term is, "flexion" and it could cause fractures in the non-fused vertebra.