Re-doing Spinal Fusion Surgery? anyone had to do it again??
#1
Posted 06 April 2009 - 09:33 AM
After an MRI and CT scan done recently, i have found that one of the screws that are in my vertebrae as a result of spinal fusion, have actually kinda pressed onto my spinal cord at a lower level (my injury is at t7, but have spinal fusion at t3-10) the screw is at t10, i am going to take it out soon, and the neurosugeon said he will revise my spinal fusion that i have currently.
Just wondering if anyone else has ever had RE-DO surgery on their back before, i'm sure there's others, and can you plz tell me about ur recovery after and any other experiences!
#2
Posted 06 April 2009 - 06:53 PM
#3
Posted 07 April 2009 - 01:21 AM
#4
Posted 07 April 2009 - 02:12 AM
I had back surgery in 2004. They placed titanium rods in my back, and a couple weeks ago I went to see the doctors because for a while my back has been hurting. Found out my rods have snapped in half, which is the reason why I have been in so much pain. I am going in on April 21st to have the surgery re-done.
The 2004 surgery, I was in the hospital for a week. ICU for two days. The pain was only there for the first few days. But my whole back was tender for about 2 months. Right after I came home from the hospital, my left shoulder blade started hurting, and ever since then, if I move it a certain way, it stings. Right after surgery, my back felt kind of "stretched". Try not to move or twist too much after surgery & during recovery. Also get plenty of rest. Any more questions, just ask
#5
Posted 07 April 2009 - 04:11 AM
ouch! rods have snapped in half?? lol i thought they were titanium...
yea i have regained most of my strength and am pretty much pain free, except for the pins and needles in my lower limbs... but yea my main concern is how i would recover and wat time frame... i am hoping to go back to uni for 2nd semester this year, but i have booked the surgery on 11 May, and uni starts at the end of June... i just hope i don't have any complications...
the surgeon said i'd be in hospital for a week, and mayb in ICU for a day or so.... and probably rehab (again!) for a couple of weeks...
did they use stitches or staples to close up the wound??? how long did you stay in bed for??
#6
Posted 07 April 2009 - 08:13 AM
My surgery was considered "major" surgery, so my recovery time was a lot longer. I laid on the couch for like a month. I started therapy like 2-3 months after surgery. I couldn't imagine going to therapy a few weeks after surgery, owch! When I moved it felt like a board was strapped to my back, so it took some time to get used to it.
I had dissolving stitches and sterry strips. I couldn't imagine getting removable stitches or staples on my back. My scar is from the top of my neck to my tailbone. Sometimes the skin heals over the stitches, and ouch! I had removable stitches several times to keep drains in, and it didn't hurt to get them removed, because they just cut the stitch, but it was just uncomfortable for me. I have a high pain tolerance, but I get the eebie jeebies with that kind of thing.
I stayed in the hospital for a week not because of complications or anything, but because I had lost blood and I couldnt get my red cell count back up. They wanted it to be 30 before I left, and that whole week it bounced around from 17-28. The day before I left it was 29, and they just told me to leave if I wanted to.
Recovery and everything just depends on how tolerable you are.
Edit: I do remember though, the day after surgery in the ICU, the physical therapist came in and made me sit up. I was sooo irritated! I was on so many drugs, I was tired, I wanted to sleep, I was grumpy, I was in pain despite how many pain medications I was on, and the last thing I wanted was for her to make me sit up. But the body never ceases to surprise me. After going through such a hard and difficult surgery, my body was still strong enough to push through. Like I said, it all depends on how tolerable you are.
This post has been edited by Beautiful: 07 April 2009 - 08:17 AM
#7
Posted 07 April 2009 - 01:39 PM
I have a bent spine it healed this way after my injury because the proper brace was not used and so i was sitting up putting preasure on my back when it needed support and as such has fused in the wrong position and is badly bent to one side i never had any surgery to fix the spine due to other life threatening injuries at the time of my accident that needed treating and the spine was left to heal on its own ,any way i was seeing the consutalt and he said the only way to fix it was surgery the main question i have is do you think it is worth having surgery to correct the spine and what would be the risk of losing the feeling and slight movment that i have now??
Sorry to nick the thread.
Si
#8
Posted 07 April 2009 - 06:12 PM
Best wishes.
#10
Posted 08 April 2009 - 04:36 AM
silone74, on Apr 7 2009, 06:39 AM, said:
Sorry to nick the thread.
Si
I always think if you have the option to improve your life in some way, you should take that opportunity. Who knows, it could get worse in the future and be more complicated to fix later. What is your injury level and how much movement do you have? Honestly, I don't think the risk of losing movement is that much at all. Your spinal cord is being protected by your backbone, and surgeons are careful when it comes to operating on that area. Honestly, I don't think you should be worrying too much about losing feeling or movement.
#11
Posted 11 April 2009 - 02:35 PM
Si
#12
Posted 12 April 2009 - 10:54 AM
this 'bone' piece provides a physical block for any nerves to 'connect' (or improve my condition in the future, or any recovery) so after the MRI i became aware of this and want to take the bone pieces out, as i have numbness below my injury and believe that taking the bone pieces out may give me some degree of recovery... the neurosurgens that i have seen have advised that taking the bones out won't give me any improvement at all and that i risk further complications...
and well if i keep the bones in, well it is pretty much impossible to recover anything as the nerves are being physically blocked by the bones...
any sugestions on whether i should take them out or not???
#13
Posted 12 April 2009 - 01:35 PM
I lift weights and I got a bunch of screws in tha back I hope they brake in half like beatiful screws
#14
Posted 26 April 2009 - 04:14 PM
AbZ, on Apr 12 2009, 04:54 AM, said:
this 'bone' piece provides a physical block for any nerves to 'connect' (or improve my condition in the future, or any recovery) so after the MRI i became aware of this and want to take the bone pieces out, as i have numbness below my injury and believe that taking the bone pieces out may give me some degree of recovery... the neurosurgens that i have seen have advised that taking the bones out won't give me any improvement at all and that i risk further complications...
and well if i keep the bones in, well it is pretty much impossible to recover anything as the nerves are being physically blocked by the bones...
any sugestions on whether i should take them out or not???
In my opinion you should leave well enough alone. Opening the spinal canal to remove bone fragments is very risky. Developing an infection in the canal could lead to something as serious as meningitis which could be fatal. I have to agree with the neurosurgeons. The probability of any recovery of sensation is small relative to the potential for infection.
#15
Posted 27 April 2009 - 12:26 AM
#16
Posted 27 April 2009 - 04:56 AM

Help












