russ1, on Apr 30 2009, 02:34 AM, said:
For the same strength frame they should be able to make an Al frame lighter than a Chromoly frame. The only reason to choose chromoly is because it is cheaper. If you can afford the extra cost then def choose Aluminium UNLESS the frame maker has chosen to make a super lightweight frame thus compromising strength. Talk to the manufacturer but Al would be the material of choice all other things being equal - you'll get a stronger frame for the same weight or a lighter frame for the same strength.
Thanks Russ -
Have been talking to a local bike shop owner - cyclist for many years. He's done everything from the ancient Schwinn Varsity (damn near caste iron) to carbon road bikes used by pros today.
He tells me that Al transfers vibrations easily because of its strong but brittle composition. Chromoly, on the other hand, he says absorbs shock well and allows the frame to flex minutely - needed for road trips.
I've been sittin' in a TiLite TR (titanium) for a few years. Great for weight, but a little lacking in the strength category.
What's your take on all this?
Thanks.
Lynn
Edited by Murray, 30 April 2009 - 09:40 PM.
Obey little. Resist much. -Whitman
Irrevence is the champion of liberty and its only defense. -Twain