Regained Sensation/movement
#1
Posted 10 August 2009 - 04:55 PM
I don't want to dance in the rain, I want to soar above the storm. - Me
Ferguson Clan Motto: Dulcius Ex Asperis (Sweeter after difficulties)
#2
Posted 10 August 2009 - 05:09 PM
#3
Posted 10 August 2009 - 06:04 PM
Dont give up hope or feel defeated just yet.. Its too early to 'settle'
#4
Posted 10 August 2009 - 10:37 PM
#5
Posted 11 August 2009 - 05:56 PM
What defines a complete injury? If you are complete,, can you really become incomplete,,, or were you really incomplete all the time? If you get any return below your injury level,, can you be called complete?
Brenda is not the first to claim "completeness" then return of sensation or function,,, so what are we talking about,,, a diagnosis by a doctor,, or a description of a condition?
I know that doctors can be mistaken about some things,, but can we really know what we're reading if we don't all subscribe to the same definitions?
A little help here,, please.
ed
#6
Posted 11 August 2009 - 06:13 PM
There are NO absolutes in SCI's. What was diagnosed as complete at the time of injury, may very well become incomplete when movement suddenly appears. This occurance must be seen as a misdiagnosis, although the doctor would argue that vehemently, no doubt stating it as a CHANGE in diagnosis. God knows, doctors by todays standards are never WRONG.--haha. They just don't have all the facts laid out in front of them.
#7
Posted 30 August 2009 - 05:54 AM
BTW, I was absolutely diagnosed at a 100% complete back in 1985. I've been recovering a little, VERY slowly since.
This post has been edited by 4estGimp: 30 August 2009 - 05:56 AM
#8
Posted 30 August 2009 - 09:41 AM
I was also initially diagnosed wrongly as a complete for a whole 5 days. None of us are alike.
#9
Posted 30 August 2009 - 09:32 PM
kiwigurl, on Aug 30 2009, 02:41 AM, said:
thanks for the tip, i'm going to start trying to do that!

Help













