Bungalows Vs Houses For Wheelchair Users - Which Is Better?
#1
Posted 07 January 2010 - 12:34 PM
accessible. I live in the UK and the only single storey properties are either flats or bungalows
and I don't like living in either of them. I'm AB and my partner is a T4 para. Currently we have
our own places but would like to move in together eventually. Also, I'm thinking of making my
home more accessible to him in the interim by putting in a stair-lift - currently he can only
access downstairs. My stairs are quite steep though so would this work?
He's lived in houses before which had a proper lift between floors but didn't seem to like them
much - he said it stopped him from going upstairs as much as he'd like because it was quite a
long-winded process. I hope we can reach a compromise and I think the ideal solution would be
to build our own property but that's a pipe-dream!
#2
Posted 07 January 2010 - 01:18 PM
Electrics .. Hydrolics..They can all go bang when least expected
So one level at ground level is my preferance
Saying that .. my access ramp is at the back of the property and composes of 3 angles
That is difficult enough when muscels are strained.
These disabled lift systems that are marketed .. are .. s l o w
Thats my choice
Self build .. now thats a intirely differant approach which only the 2 of you can answer
#3
Posted 07 January 2010 - 01:28 PM
dangerousdave, on Jan 7 2010, 01:18 PM, said:
Electrics .. Hydrolics..They can all go bang when least expected
So one level at ground level is my preferance
Saying that .. my access ramp is at the back of the property and composes of 3 angles
That is difficult enough when muscels are strained.
These disabled lift systems that are marketed .. are .. s l o w
Thats my choice
Self build .. now thats a intirely differant approach which only the 2 of you can answer
Nothing wrong with bungalows if they're laid out right - my pet hate is a bungalow where the rooms including bedrooms are all accessed off one hallway. My house has the bedrooms all at one end with their own corridor and the lounge kitchen etc at the other. It's like having an upstairs but on the ground floor if you see what I mean.
#4
Posted 07 January 2010 - 03:12 PM
Any doors .. all doors
So there is a front door for AB's .. back door for wheelies .. 4 internal doors always open .. no privacy in my loo .. 1 internal door removed
Last place I had the council ignored my requests for doors I could manage -- until they noticed they were in the garden
#5
Posted 07 January 2010 - 04:31 PM
Once I got a spasm and the leg smacked him straight in the chest and drove him back down to the bottom, of course, I had to lock onto the banister and couldn't stop myself from laughing.
Any-how's, the place I bought is single story, I made sure the only thing that is designed for the chair is the roll in shower, doors are two foot ten inches wide, everything else is the norm, no dropped light switches, counters, or anything else, when entering the house you wouldn't know a para lived there, and I live on my own, I don't have carers or anyone to do anything in house as a para has the capability of doing it all himself..
If I was you I wouldn't be too worried about making drastic changes to the house as long as he can get in the door
#6
Posted 07 January 2010 - 10:26 PM
My son lived in a house before his accident, whilst the downstairs was open plan, it was not suitable for a thro lift, bathroom upstairs plus a step down to it so totally unsuitable. Getting on and off a stairlift would take a lot of effort for him, and would need a lot of space top + bottom for chair. He has just moved into a bungalow which has made a huge difference to him. So much more space and far better layout. Large hallway, with kitchen/lounge etc one end and a corrider down to bathroom/bedrooms the other end. - Like russ1 said definitely the best layout.
It also comes down to width of doors, turning space etc.
If money was no object then pupose built to your own spec would be best option everytime.
Why don't you go and look at some flats/bungalows, you may be pleasantly surprised, and even quite like them.
Happy house (bungalow?) hunting!
#7
Posted 08 January 2010 - 03:22 PM
#8
Posted 10 January 2010 - 01:57 AM
Big Plus: View of the Pacific Ocean and 7 minutes to Project Walk where I do therapy.
They currently have a studio and a one bedroom available - any takers? The complex use to be a retirement facility for Missionaries, hence the accessibility.
#9
Posted 10 January 2010 - 04:41 PM
KeepTheFaith, on Jan 9 2010, 08:57 PM, said:
Big Plus: View of the Pacific Ocean and 7 minutes to Project Walk where I do therapy.
They currently have a studio and a one bedroom available - any takers? The complex use to be a retirement facility for Missionaries, hence the accessibility.
That sounds so nice. Where and how much? pM me if you like.
Pat
#10
Posted 10 January 2010 - 09:21 PM
area we'll be looking in and also we need to be near the right schools for my daughter. There just
aren't any in the catchment which is a real problem.
Anyone got experience of through-floor lifts?
#11 *Jeff V*
Posted 10 January 2010 - 10:18 PM
Jana09, on Jan 10 2010, 04:21 PM, said:
area we'll be looking in and also we need to be near the right schools for my daughter. There just
aren't any in the catchment which is a real problem.
Anyone got experience of through-floor lifts?
Hi Jana09
Your right, a bungalow is ultimately the best. The only problem is the population is aging and bungalows are becoming very high in demand - where 10 years ago nobody wanted them. After almost a year looking to buy a bungalow and getting into bidding wars to pay way more than the original asking, We gave up and bought a split level raised ranch...We just got the plans for renovations last week to make our home accessible and the cost is estimated at $250,000 CAD.. We bought the home for $225,000 CAD. We will be installing two floor lifts (due to fire regulations) one of them is a specialized one that opens at the front and one side (90 degrees) - that is 20% of the whole renovation budget.. If you can get a hold of a vacant property it really is more cost effective now to build from scratch.
What we do not find fair is our mill rate will double. We will be required to pay taxes on a 1/2 million dollar home because of the renovations when the purchase price was less than a 1/4 million; it's not fair to be penalized because of a disability. Our mill rate will be going from $210/ month to almost $450. If you can get a piece of vacant land and build a bungalow your building costs should be less and you won't keep paying out of pocket because of an increased millage.
We too wanted something close to our daughters school, unfortunately we couldn't find anything and now we drive her to school - two trips a day/100 kilometres a day. We just hope the price of gas stays down until she graduates in two years. We could not afford to stay in the city and had to move to a rural village so there is no public transport. Not even a cab or a train, nothing.
We are very very fortunate that insurance is covering the cost of the renovations. I know a lot of you are struggling just to afford a proper chair, however the millage rates and the added gas expense will really tax our budget. (Have you ever thought of moving to Florida (I know your in the UK) but you can buy a nice bungalow for less than the cost of a power wheelchair in Orlando).
Good luck & patience.
#12 *Jeff V*
Posted 10 January 2010 - 10:25 PM
BillS, on Jan 8 2010, 10:22 AM, said:
Hey Bill, A bungalow is pretty much the same as a rancher. I believe the only difference is a bungalow is a rancher with a basement; Here in Canada anyway...of course an igloo could be considered a rancher; as they do not have a basement - lord knows it's cold enough to build one right now LOL!!!
Cheers
#13
Posted 10 January 2010 - 10:32 PM
Mate lives in Germany and just outside Hanover there is a row of architects shops (to do with german planning regs...) who all sell a different plan. The Huf House was made well known in this country after Grand Designs but there are loads of different prefabs. Then you can just plan nice big open plan, and avoid all the aggro of all the different trades on site. I'm hoping to take a drive out there in the Spring, combine it with a few other things.
As for lifts, I prefer anything that I don't have to get out of my chair - hence the remote controlled pallet stacker at her last place to get up to the 1st floor flat!!
Good luck. Patience!
Edited by guido, 10 January 2010 - 10:33 PM.
#14
Posted 11 January 2010 - 07:42 AM
Hope this helps
Jules
x
#15
Posted 11 January 2010 - 02:42 PM
jules, on Jan 11 2010, 07:42 AM, said:
Hope this helps
Jules
x
I bought a nice older two sory with basement in 1992. It was fairly beat up, so I wasnt shy about making idiosycratic modifications. The basement was unfinished (open floor joists for the first floor overhead) so passing pipes and wires was easy.
Downstairs, there were two large rooms facing each other across a corridor, and at the end of that was a kitchen/dining area the whole width and nearly half the depth of the house. I took one of those rooms as bedroom, eventually with both a piano and fireplace. The second room, I took as my office, and at one end I installed a bath and a toilet. At that point I didn't even put in a dividing wall, just a big studio with bathroom fixtures. I used to joke that some people have bathrooms in their offices... well, I had an office in many bathroom!
So, I never went upstairs. I hate having to change levels as a routine anyway and I had no money for a lift.
My wife had the run of three bedrooms and a bathroom upstairs for her clothes and dressing and female toilet. Exercise equipment. Hobbies. Whatever. Lots of room.
Then the kids started coming. First a couple of little babies/kids in our bedroom, and then when they got older and new babies pushed them out, my office got cut in half so half could be a kids bedroom. And when the second wave of little ones had to move out of our room, the two older ones had to go upstairs. A that point, almost twelve years after we had bought the house, we finally put in a lift so that I could look after the kids properly, and I also got access to the basement where I could keep a permanent tool set up, and practice my pistol shooting.
But here is the point: All of this was done on a shoestring budget. We paid the plumber a few thousand to put a bath and a toilet at one end of a room and a sink beside the bed in another. We did the separation and the childen's room ourselves. It has been a constant ongoing project. We live in an evolving environment.
The basic idea is that needs change over time. As Guido says, just get into the place, and as time goes by you can modify it on a small budget, especially if you are able to rough it a little and are happy living in a house that looks a little like a shack.
Forget the magazine pictures. Buy the most square feet that you can, because as time goes by you will need/want them, and if you don't have them you will be unhappy or have to move.
The more adaptation and general comfort you build into one home, the less you will want to move.
So my attitude is Old and Big rather than Small and New.
Work paid by someone else (govt, insurance) will always cost three times what work paid and done by you will cost. That is the basic collectivist illusion revealed. (Thirty dollar hammers and two hundred dollar toilet seats.). And if you avoid the big renovation you will also avoid the high taxes. An old home equals low taxes. Bit by bit with no major upgrade equals low taxes maintained over time.
Best Regards,
Gordon
Edited by gordonr, 11 January 2010 - 02:44 PM.
#16
Posted 11 January 2010 - 03:12 PM
offer in deepest Surrey! GordonR, your project sounds most interesting, I especially like the idea of his and hers floors, that could solve everything! I love my own space and could see it working. I'm already planning it out in my head - his bedroom/bathroom, kitchen, living area on the ground floor. Mine and the kids bedrooms (aged 10 and 12) on the first. I could go to sleep with him and then go to my own room when he starts snoring.....
#17
Posted 11 January 2010 - 05:44 PM
gordonr, on Jan 11 2010, 02:42 PM, said:
The more adaptation and general comfort you build into one home, the less you will want to move.
So my attitude is Old and Big rather than Small and New.
Work paid by someone else (govt, insurance) will always cost three times what work paid and done by you will cost. That is the basic collectivist illusion revealed. (Thirty dollar hammers and two hundred dollar toilet seats.). And if you avoid the big renovation you will also avoid the high taxes. An old home equals low taxes. Bit by bit with no major upgrade equals low taxes maintained over time.
Square metres and patience are always the best in the long run.
Jana, point of my last post was to say there are cheaper alternatives to the hufhaus, but sometimes I think quicker than i type!
#18 *Jeff V*
Posted 11 January 2010 - 11:33 PM
gordonr, on Jan 11 2010, 09:42 AM, said:
jules, on Jan 11 2010, 07:42 AM, said:
Hope this helps
Jules
x
I bought a nice older two sory with basement in 1992. It was fairly beat up, so I wasnt shy about making idiosycratic modifications. The basement was unfinished (open floor joists for the first floor overhead) so passing pipes and wires was easy.
Downstairs, there were two large rooms facing each other across a corridor, and at the end of that was a kitchen/dining area the whole width and nearly half the depth of the house. I took one of those rooms as bedroom, eventually with both a piano and fireplace. The second room, I took as my office, and at one end I installed a bath and a toilet. At that point I didn't even put in a dividing wall, just a big studio with bathroom fixtures. I used to joke that some people have bathrooms in their offices... well, I had an office in many bathroom!
So, I never went upstairs. I hate having to change levels as a routine anyway and I had no money for a lift.
My wife had the run of three bedrooms and a bathroom upstairs for her clothes and dressing and female toilet. Exercise equipment. Hobbies. Whatever. Lots of room.
Then the kids started coming. First a couple of little babies/kids in our bedroom, and then when they got older and new babies pushed them out, my office got cut in half so half could be a kids bedroom. And when the second wave of little ones had to move out of our room, the two older ones had to go upstairs. A that point, almost twelve years after we had bought the house, we finally put in a lift so that I could look after the kids properly, and I also got access to the basement where I could keep a permanent tool set up, and practice my pistol shooting.
But here is the point: All of this was done on a shoestring budget. We paid the plumber a few thousand to put a bath and a toilet at one end of a room and a sink beside the bed in another. We did the separation and the childen's room ourselves. It has been a constant ongoing project. We live in an evolving environment.
The basic idea is that needs change over time. As Guido says, just get into the place, and as time goes by you can modify it on a small budget, especially if you are able to rough it a little and are happy living in a house that looks a little like a shack.
Forget the magazine pictures. Buy the most square feet that you can, because as time goes by you will need/want them, and if you don't have them you will be unhappy or have to move.
The more adaptation and general comfort you build into one home, the less you will want to move.
So my attitude is Old and Big rather than Small and New.
Work paid by someone else (govt, insurance) will always cost three times what work paid and done by you will cost. That is the basic collectivist illusion revealed. (Thirty dollar hammers and two hundred dollar toilet seats.). And if you avoid the big renovation you will also avoid the high taxes. An old home equals low taxes. Bit by bit with no major upgrade equals low taxes maintained over time.
Best Regards,
Gordon
Gordon, truer words were never spoken about insurance and government. My renovations have barely started, and all I have is one three prong electrical outlet...total cost to date $28,682. This included $2,500 for a property survey (a piece of paper I handed to an engineer...no physical survey was done), $13,000 for a two hour engineer visit, and the balance just stupid stuff like "visit" fees and consulting. What a racket!!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users




Top








