Paddy Power Wheelchair Advert Banned From Tv
Started by
Apparelyzed
, Mar 10 2010 04:03 PM
15 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 10 March 2010 - 04:03 PM
Paddy Power wheelchair advert banned from TV
Bookmaker, Paddy Power, has got around its latest advert being banned from TV by simply posting it on YouTube.
The on air push was set to co-incide with the Cheltenham Festival, one of the biggest sports betting events of the year for Paddy Power, and forthcoming World Cup.
But plans were scuppered after the original script, as created by Big Al's Creative Emporium, received a thumbs down from TV advertising regulator, Clearcast.
http://www.youtube.com/v/ePxfn2FVc0w
Bookmaker, Paddy Power, has got around its latest advert being banned from TV by simply posting it on YouTube.
The on air push was set to co-incide with the Cheltenham Festival, one of the biggest sports betting events of the year for Paddy Power, and forthcoming World Cup.
But plans were scuppered after the original script, as created by Big Al's Creative Emporium, received a thumbs down from TV advertising regulator, Clearcast.
http://www.youtube.com/v/ePxfn2FVc0w
#4
Posted 11 March 2010 - 07:08 AM
Apparelyzed, on Mar 11 2010, 12:03 AM, said:
Paddy Power wheelchair advert banned from TV
A Clearcast spokesperson said that they were concerned about the “juvenile behaviour” portrayed in an advert for a betting company and that the advert could be seen as “offensive” in the way that the men with disabilities were portrayed.
“It could be considered that they were being laughed at and at the butt of the joke rather than being in control of their situation,” she added. “We would never ban a disabled person from an advert, but they need to be portrayed in positive and feisty way, in control of their situation.”
The advert is the third in a campaign designed to demonstrate Paddy Power’s sense of fun and irreverent humour. The ads pay particular focus to Paddy Power’s industry leading Money-Back specials – where
A Clearcast spokesperson said that they were concerned about the “juvenile behaviour” portrayed in an advert for a betting company and that the advert could be seen as “offensive” in the way that the men with disabilities were portrayed.
“It could be considered that they were being laughed at and at the butt of the joke rather than being in control of their situation,” she added. “We would never ban a disabled person from an advert, but they need to be portrayed in positive and feisty way, in control of their situation.”
The advert is the third in a campaign designed to demonstrate Paddy Power’s sense of fun and irreverent humour. The ads pay particular focus to Paddy Power’s industry leading Money-Back specials – where
They seemed pretty 'feisty' and totally 'in control of their situation' to me. The restauranteur was the one not in control and appeared to be the butt of the joke.
I would have thought it caused more offence to Indian curry shop owners than anyone.
Did they bother to ask a disabled person if they found it offensive? Probably not.
I hate how people think we are going to be offended at the slightest thing.
Todays greatest labour saving device is tomorrow
My spine is all wrong but my backbone is strong.
My spine is all wrong but my backbone is strong.
#5
Posted 11 March 2010 - 10:39 AM
Yes i think that was a funny ad,very refreshing to see us act like normal humans having a laugh,i did that once when i was seventeen on holiday in spain with my brother! we had virtually run out of money and were starving,thinking back it was wrong of course but at seventeen we did'nt think!!
people in w/chairs on tv are often portrayed a 'serious,thoughtful,sensitive etc which is not really the norm
people in w/chairs on tv are often portrayed a 'serious,thoughtful,sensitive etc which is not really the norm
#9
Posted 11 March 2010 - 01:23 PM
Just for everyone's information;
this is known, technically, as "making off"...[without payment].
Like shoplifting, its an "either way" offence; which means that defendants can elect for... a jury trial!
This, presumably, is what Clearcast are saying, regardless of the fact that successful advertising always evokes a happier, more beautiful and whimsical world than any of us has ever experienced.
I think the advert's a laugh, and that TV screening would do far more good than harm.
this is known, technically, as "making off"...[without payment].
Like shoplifting, its an "either way" offence; which means that defendants can elect for... a jury trial!
This, presumably, is what Clearcast are saying, regardless of the fact that successful advertising always evokes a happier, more beautiful and whimsical world than any of us has ever experienced.
I think the advert's a laugh, and that TV screening would do far more good than harm.
Bob
#12
Posted 12 March 2010 - 03:30 AM
K, I just got a chance to actually watch it (wasn't at my computer before and couldn't watch on my phone) and I have to ask, how is that offensive? If anything I'm a little bit offended that someone would think that's offensive to anyone. And you want offensive wheelchair material, watch Just For Laughs Gags (canucks will probably know this, others probably not). Every wheelchair "gag" on that show depicts people in wheelchairs as inept, imobile, unable to do anything at all. I mean, how many of us carry around a stopsign and need someone to act as crossing guard whule crossing the street?

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users






Top









