Wound Vac Versus Flap Surgery
#1
Posted 29 March 2010 - 07:27 PM
My husband is back in the hospital --for a UTI infection. But since he's there, they are recommending two choices for healing a pressure sore on his cocyx --wound vac, which they say takes longer or flap surgery, which means he goes under the knife.
Has anyone been faced with this choice? How did you choose? Why did you choose what you did? Is it possible to heal from a Stage 4 pressure wound with just a wound vac?
Thanks!
J
#2
*deb4604*
Posted 30 March 2010 - 12:37 AM
Hi folks:
My husband is back in the hospital --for a UTI infection. But since he's there, they are recommending two choices for healing a pressure sore on his cocyx --wound vac, which they say takes longer or flap surgery, which means he goes under the knife.
Has anyone been faced with this choice? How did you choose? Why did you choose what you did? Is it possible to heal from a Stage 4 pressure wound with just a wound vac?
Thanks!
J
I've seen remarkable healing from wound vacs before and you should be able to see some progression fairly quickly. It may take time, but from what I've heard about flap surgery (no personal experience but there have been many postings in the past), I'd at least give the wound vac a try. It's a minor inconvenience at times, but I think well worth giving it a try.
#3
Posted 30 March 2010 - 02:15 AM
#4
Posted 30 March 2010 - 03:47 AM
Hi folks:
My husband is back in the hospital --for a UTI infection. But since he's there, they are recommending two choices for healing a pressure sore on his cocyx --wound vac, which they say takes longer or flap surgery, which means he goes under the knife.
Has anyone been faced with this choice? How did you choose? Why did you choose what you did? Is it possible to heal from a Stage 4 pressure wound with just a wound vac?
Thanks!
J
scoobygimp has found a product called dermawound. below is his discription of how this product has healed his wound without the wound vac or surgery.
"I hate Mersa. As of this week I have given up on the vacuum treatment and the trips to the wound clinic. I found a paste that works better and faster than the KCI vac machines. The acti-vacs are a pain in the ass--pun intended. The dermawound stuff I'm using has produced more results in one week than the vacuum did in a month. A wasted month. It was wasted because I trusted the professionals who recommended it without doing my own research. I forgot my mantra "question authority" The vac actually macerated some healing skin and set me back. The technology is not cost-effective. The machine cost $26,000 and lord knows what the clinic is billing my insurance for the vac rental. I'm going cold-turkey on the vac and sticking with Dermawound. Google "Dermawound" by progessive doctors. The stuff is amazing and keeps MRSA at bay. It has given me confidence I will not need surgery. My Stage 4 wound is 1.5 cm by 2 cm and still has the dead white skin on the bottom of the wound bed. The vac did nothing to the dead white fiber crap (fibrin) but dermawound is dissolving it. Next month I hope to report a fibrin free and smaller sized wound. This is booorrring--hence my newbie game.. It is nice to have this community to turn to when you need a friend who can relate to your state."
if you have any questions let scoobygimp know he really has healed a stage 4 wound and it even handled mrsa.
mellgator
#5
Posted 01 April 2010 - 09:36 PM
Scooby vouching for Mellow vouching for me. We are..
Yours in the struggle,
Edited by Scooby Gimp, 01 April 2010 - 09:38 PM.
#6
Posted 24 May 2010 - 08:16 PM
My husband is back in the hospital --for a UTI infection. But since he's there, they are recommending two choices for healing a pressure sore on his cocyx --wound vac, which they say takes longer or flap surgery, which means he goes under the knife.
Has anyone been faced with this choice? How did you choose? Why did you choose what you did? Is it possible to heal from a Stage 4 pressure wound with just a wound vac?
Thanks!
J
scoobygimp has found a product called dermawound. below is his discription of how this product has healed his wound without the wound vac or surgery.
"I hate Mersa. As of this week I have given up on the vacuum treatment and the trips to the wound clinic. I found a paste that works better and faster than the KCI vac machines. The acti-vacs are a pain in the ass--pun intended. The dermawound stuff I'm using has produced more results in one week than the vacuum did in a month. A wasted month. It was wasted because I trusted the professionals who recommended it without doing my own research. I forgot my mantra "question authority" The vac actually macerated some healing skin and set me back. The technology is not cost-effective. The machine cost $26,000 and lord knows what the clinic is billing my insurance for the vac rental. I'm going cold-turkey on the vac and sticking with Dermawound. Google "Dermawound" by progessive doctors. The stuff is amazing and keeps MRSA at bay. It has given me confidence I will not need surgery. My Stage 4 wound is 1.5 cm by 2 cm and still has the dead white skin on the bottom of the wound bed. The vac did nothing to the dead white fiber crap (fibrin) but dermawound is dissolving it. Next month I hope to report a fibrin free and smaller sized wound. This is booorrring--hence my newbie game.. It is nice to have this community to turn to when you need a friend who can relate to your state."
if you have any questions let scoobygimp know he really has healed a stage 4 wound and it even handled mrsa.
mellgator
[/quote]
#7
Posted 09 August 2010 - 10:49 PM
#8
Posted 10 August 2010 - 12:09 PM
#9
Posted 18 August 2010 - 04:13 PM
Any pressure wound is a terrible thing, and the recovery process has been the most frustrating thing that I've ever had to deal with as a quadriplegic. But, my advice would be to go with the vac rather than the flap surgery.
#10
Posted 18 August 2010 - 05:26 PM
I have done both -- flap surgery 10 years ago, and wound vacs for stage four ulcers 8 years ago as well as presently (almost healed). The flap surgery seemed great -- six weeks of being immobilized was actually relatively short. However, the entire area broke down again two years later. The wound vac is slow and can be very frustrating, but it does work even for a very deep wound. The first time it took about five months, and currently I have been using it for three months. The battery lasts a long time and you can be somewhat mobile with it (although to really heal the wound you must be off of it). There are new materials which make it far less likely for the seal to leak. I think it is also really good at preventing infections.
Any pressure wound is a terrible thing, and the recovery process has been the most frustrating thing that I've ever had to deal with as a quadriplegic. But, my advice would be to go with the vac rather than the flap surgery.
Just to update - we went with the wound vac and his wound healed up very nicely!!!! So glad we went that route! Thanks for all the advice.
#11
Posted 20 August 2010 - 07:03 PM
Hi folks:
My husband is back in the hospital --for a UTI infection. But since he's there, they are recommending two choices for healing a pressure sore on his cocyx --wound vac, which they say takes longer or flap surgery, which means he goes under the knife.
Has anyone been faced with this choice? How did you choose? Why did you choose what you did? Is it possible to heal from a Stage 4 pressure wound with just a wound vac?
Thanks!
J
My fiance has been fighting a pressure sore since the beginning of the year. He started off treating it with home health coming out two to three times a week and treating it, increasing his protein and taking supplements, a wound vac which only seemed to make it worse. More tunnels developed off the initial sore and due to the placement of his sore the vac would not stay on for more than 24 hrs. The vac seemed to be more of a hassle than anything, however, he wanted to try every option possible before contemplating surgery. After exhausting every option he consulted with his doctor and she referred him to a plastic surgeon who advised that a flap surgery is necessary. Here we sit today waiting for the call from the surgeons office as to when the surgery will be. Post surgery will consist of laying on his side in a "specialty" hospital for four weeks, however, this seems like nothing compared to the many months that we have been dealing with the sore. Of course, there is always a risk involved of the flap not working and other complications from surgery, but I think we are both ready to get this over with and move on my with our life!
#12
Posted 09 September 2010 - 08:59 PM
#13
Posted 05 October 2010 - 01:56 PM
i have done three flaps since 2001 became sci in feb 1999 tried wound vac twice on last two surgery no help usually i will heal so much then regress deeper even with total bed rest and laying on belly surgery took care of prob and spent less heal time then the unfruitfull affects of wound vacHi folks:
My husband is back in the hospital --for a UTI infection. But since he's there, they are recommending two choices for healing a pressure sore on his cocyx --wound vac, which they say takes longer or flap surgery, which means he goes under the knife.
Has anyone been faced with this choice? How did you choose? Why did you choose what you did? Is it possible to heal from a Stage 4 pressure wound with just a wound vac?
Thanks!
J
i have a problem since my last surgery i have been afflicted with a fiscula the doc wants to do surgery i am not to keen on that i am trying to find a natural way to heal this up any suggestions doc does not know if this is from old surgery or from the bowls said he has to open it up to find out help if ya know anything thanks robert
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





Top







