Hoc Monoski
#1
Posted 07 May 2010 - 01:35 AM
http://adaptivesportsforums.com Non-commercial adaptive sports user community
#3
Posted 08 May 2010 - 03:36 AM
http://adaptivesportsforums.com Non-commercial adaptive sports user community
#6
Posted 09 May 2010 - 09:14 PM
Edited by twisted_ophelia, 09 May 2010 - 09:15 PM.
http://www.twitter.com/twisted_ophelia
#7
Posted 10 May 2010 - 12:50 AM
twisted_ophelia, on May 9 2010, 02:14 PM, said:
I agree. The company owner told me the ski was aimed at advanced/competitive skiers. I still want to give it a try. I've been skiing less than ten times and it feels like I am progressing quickly. Practice, practice, practice.... I would consider myself an intermediate level skier now. During the first lesson I had doubts I could even learn to ski. So I am very happy with my progress.
http://adaptivesportsforums.com Non-commercial adaptive sports user community
#8
Posted 10 May 2010 - 04:45 AM
driley, on May 9 2010, 08:50 PM, said:
twisted_ophelia, on May 9 2010, 02:14 PM, said:
I agree. The company owner told me the ski was aimed at advanced/competitive skiers. I still want to give it a try. I've been skiing less than ten times and it feels like I am progressing quickly. Practice, practice, practice.... I would consider myself an intermediate level skier now. During the first lesson I had doubts I could even learn to ski. So I am very happy with my progress.
Not to discourage but I will just repeat the advice I was given by my friend who is getting the HOC ski when I talked to him about it. He knows I am using/ordering the RPC and has skied with me while I'm using it and when he showed me the HOC, I, of course, saw how awesome and cool it is and he said pretty much that getting a ski you are not currently ready for is a bad idea and that I will just be disappointed. I was a skier before my accident and am also happy with progress I've been making but it's like buying a Corvette for your first car. It may look cool and but when you start denting and scratching the car because you're still learning, you'll probably regret buying that Corvette. LOL. I don't know if that makes sense but put ego aside (not saying you have a big ego), and wait til you are ready to buy a HOC. That's what I did. Ths aforementioned friend is a ski instructor with DSES btw. So he knows what he is talking about. There is a HUGE difference between "intermediate" and "advanced/competitive". Wait a couple seasons, improve, ski Cornice up in Mammoth (hehe) and then go from there. The friend who uses the HOC (or who will be using it, I should say) is a highly experienced skier who backcountries and does big mountain stuff. That's the type of skier the HOC is made for. You'll get there no doubt but while learning, don't make your life more difficult, you know? That's the advice I was basically given and I'm sticking to it :-)
Edited by twisted_ophelia, 10 May 2010 - 04:45 AM.
http://www.twitter.com/twisted_ophelia
#9
Posted 10 May 2010 - 12:42 PM
twisted_ophelia, on May 9 2010, 09:45 PM, said:
driley, on May 9 2010, 08:50 PM, said:
twisted_ophelia, on May 9 2010, 02:14 PM, said:
I agree. The company owner told me the ski was aimed at advanced/competitive skiers. I still want to give it a try. I've been skiing less than ten times and it feels like I am progressing quickly. Practice, practice, practice.... I would consider myself an intermediate level skier now. During the first lesson I had doubts I could even learn to ski. So I am very happy with my progress.
Not to discourage but I will just repeat the advice I was given by my friend who is getting the HOC ski when I talked to him about it. He knows I am using/ordering the RPC and has skied with me while I'm using it and when he showed me the HOC, I, of course, saw how awesome and cool it is and he said pretty much that getting a ski you are not currently ready for is a bad idea and that I will just be disappointed. I was a skier before my accident and am also happy with progress I've been making but it's like buying a Corvette for your first car. It may look cool and but when you start denting and scratching the car because you're still learning, you'll probably regret buying that Corvette. LOL. I don't know if that makes sense but put ego aside (not saying you have a big ego), and wait til you are ready to buy a HOC. That's what I did. Ths aforementioned friend is a ski instructor with DSES btw. So he knows what he is talking about. There is a HUGE difference between "intermediate" and "advanced/competitive". Wait a couple seasons, improve, ski Cornice up in Mammoth (hehe) and then go from there. The friend who uses the HOC (or who will be using it, I should say) is a highly experienced skier who backcountries and does big mountain stuff. That's the type of skier the HOC is made for. You'll get there no doubt but while learning, don't make your life more difficult, you know? That's the advice I was basically given and I'm sticking to it :-)
I completely agree with what you are saying. I am just going to give it a try and will not get one unless I feel comfortable with my ability to ride it. If I can't work out a demo, then I will most likely get a Praschberger for my first ski. I will be trying a Prasch this weekend.
I am confident in my ability to get down Cornice in Mammoth. Gravity always wins!!!
BTW, you know me from Facebook and Twitter
http://adaptivesportsforums.com Non-commercial adaptive sports user community
#11
Posted 10 May 2010 - 09:59 PM
qman, on May 10 2010, 02:32 PM, said:
Here is a link to my not too often used twitter account http://twitter.com/my395
From there anyone should be able to find me on Facebook.
http://adaptivesportsforums.com Non-commercial adaptive sports user community
#12
Posted 11 May 2010 - 03:57 AM
http://www.twitter.com/twisted_ophelia
#13
Posted 11 May 2010 - 04:04 AM
driley, on May 10 2010, 08:42 AM, said:
I am confident in my ability to get down Cornice in Mammoth. Gravity always wins!!!
BTW, you know me from Facebook and Twitter
LMAO! That cracked me up! Yeah, true, we can ALL get down Cornice. But in one piece? Questionable! Have you ridden the gondola up to the top yet? That's got some insanely beautiful views of the mountain and mountains around it.
http://www.twitter.com/twisted_ophelia
#14
Posted 11 May 2010 - 04:31 AM
twisted_ophelia, on May 10 2010, 09:04 PM, said:
I have only been to the top once and that was in the summer. The views are incredible. As fun as skiing is, I must admit that the views are part of what pushes me higher and higher up the mountain.
http://adaptivesportsforums.com Non-commercial adaptive sports user community
#15
Posted 12 May 2010 - 03:46 AM
driley, on May 11 2010, 12:31 AM, said:
twisted_ophelia, on May 10 2010, 09:04 PM, said:
I have only been to the top once and that was in the summer. The views are incredible. As fun as skiing is, I must admit that the views are part of what pushes me higher and higher up the mountain.
Agreed. Did you check out my pics of the mountains in my Mammoth album on FB? The one from this year, not last year. Seeing some of those mountains (not even the ones on Mammoth Mountain, but the other ones like around Convict Lake and Mcgee Creek) was insanely beautiful. They looked so pristine and perfect, I just want to even lay in the snow and make a snow angel hahaha
http://www.twitter.com/twisted_ophelia
#16
Posted 16 May 2010 - 04:30 PM
Kevin
Edited by kev670, 16 May 2010 - 05:15 PM.
#18
Posted 18 May 2010 - 03:21 AM
kev670, on May 16 2010, 09:30 AM, said:
Kevin
Kevin,
It looks like you have done a great job on the new ski. All the design decisions make complete sense to me.
All the videos of Tyler Walker highlight the suspension and it looks like it shines in this regards. Any videos of paras using the ski? Just wondering what it looks like to have the bucket moving with the footrest remaining stable.
As an incomplete T10 that weighs about 200lbs, my real concern is being able to pick myself up from a fall with the HOC, as it sits rather high.
http://adaptivesportsforums.com Non-commercial adaptive sports user community
#19
Posted 18 May 2010 - 03:56 AM
wheeels, on May 16 2010, 04:41 PM, said:
Two questions
1) How much does it weigh?
2) Where can I test one out?
It weighs about 28lb. You'll have to ask Steve when you can demo one. I think he said he'll be up at Mt. Hood in June with a couple skis for the US team to demo. Give him a call, contact info is on the website www.teamhoc.com
#20
Posted 18 May 2010 - 08:49 PM
driley, on May 17 2010, 08:21 PM, said:
kev670, on May 16 2010, 09:30 AM, said:
Kevin
Kevin,
It looks like you have done a great job on the new ski. All the design decisions make complete sense to me.
All the videos of Tyler Walker highlight the suspension and it looks like it shines in this regards. Any videos of paras using the ski? Just wondering what it looks like to have the bucket moving with the footrest remaining stable.
As an incomplete T10 that weighs about 200lbs, my real concern is being able to pick myself up from a fall with the HOC, as it sits rather high.
Thanks for the compliment! I'm not sure if there are any videos available of paras skiing it. I'll bring that up to Steve, it would be a good idea to show how your legs move with the suspension. It was a major concern of ours when designing it if it was going to be acceptable to have that movement. It is because of this that we don't have straps over the top of the thighs, only at the hips. Of the paras we've had ski it, no one has complained or even mentioned anything about it. In my experience, it's not an issue but I've never really pushed it hard enough to get a lot of movement out of the suspension. The height of it has been an issue for some people, however. This is the compromise we had to make though to have 8" of progressive suspension travel, and no lift system. Our first production run of skis sat about 17" from the bottom of the bucket to the bottom of the "boot", unloaded. For the next production run (available now) I have revised the frame to lower the height down 1.5". However, to do this we had to flip the shock over so the reservoir faces down, which of course now makes it more difficult to adjust. Just another compromise to have the best suspension around (-: We have also developed a binding that will allow a further 1" reduction in height, for a total unloaded height of about 14.5". This should help a lot, but no matter what it's not going to be easy to get up after a fall.
#21
Posted 19 May 2010 - 01:16 AM
kev670, on May 18 2010, 01:49 PM, said:
I would say getting the seat down to 14.5 is pretty good. Compromises have to be made.
Motocross bikes have a very tall seat height. No getting around this while still having the required suspension for the job. There are other off-road motorcycles that are designed for less competitive riders, women etc. These bike have less suspension travel and lower seat heights.
The mono ski market may not be big enough. But if your ski sales take off, you could consider a "scaled" down version for less experienced or aggressive riders. Just a suggestion.
http://adaptivesportsforums.com Non-commercial adaptive sports user community
#23
Posted 30 August 2010 - 07:00 PM
Just got the HOC outriggers and the new monoski!!!! Been skiing for 48 years and had the Pro Comp wired in 1.5hrs. So I called Steve, checked out the ski and now all I need is snow!!!! Am always out growing my rehab stuff so looking forward to the challenge of the HOC steed!!!!
#25
Posted 15 October 2010 - 01:07 AM
T bone, on 30 August 2010 - 07:00 PM, said:
Just got the HOC outriggers and the new monoski!!!! Been skiing for 48 years and had the Pro Comp wired in 1.5hrs. So I called Steve, checked out the ski and now all I need is snow!!!! Am always out growing my rehab stuff so looking forward to the challenge of the HOC steed!!!!
Hey T Bone, what do you think of the outriggers?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users




Top








