greybeard, on May 20 2010, 02:32 PM, said:
Don't forget that paralympians are not all wheelchair users. Some really can do running, jumping and standing still.
I'm reserving judgement on the mascots although my first impressions are not too favourable. At least a little bit of effort has gone into creating them - unlike that bloody awful logo.
You're quite right Greybeard - but don't let it go to your head! I thought about it again after I'd posted and I thought about those who don't use chairs. Maybe 'Mandeville' could have been shown with just one leg - it would have been an obvious disability but he could still be shown running with one of those brilliant 'spring' type prosthetic legs (I don't know what they're called). Alternatively, he could have been shown in a chair but doing fast wheelies or even back flips (I've seen someone doing that on the web, amazing). Either of those would show a disabled person (or character) doing something fantastic without having to 'ditch' the disability to achieve it. I don't think 'Manderville' is a good name either, not if it's aimed at children - should have been something catchy like 'Gimp', lol. Maybe I'm being too pernickety, at least it's good that Paralympians are included. If nothing else I'm sure all those 'Pretenders' out there will be able to relate to him
HiltonP, on May 20 2010, 02:39 PM, said:
For some reason the powers that be appear to want to "cute-si-fi" world sport. Everyone has to be nice, and pleasant, and polite, etc . . . whatever happened to hard-nosed physical competition?
I agree HiltonP, it's a major competitive event and as such should be taken seriously. As for hard-nosed physical competition, there's nothing quite like it - anyone want to nude wrestle?
Edited by graphic, 20 May 2010 - 05:53 PM.