List Of Crash Tested Wheelchairs?
#1
Posted 05 September 2010 - 07:00 PM
thanks wendy
#2
Posted 05 September 2010 - 11:00 PM
Although I cannot move and I have to speak through a computer, in my mind I am free.
#3
Posted 05 September 2010 - 11:07 PM
Shawn
#4
Posted 06 September 2010 - 09:06 AM
Your average bus driver is not going to know one wheelchair from another, I guess they are trying to cover themselves in case something happens. I would also suggest contacting them for further information
Memento Mori
#5
Posted 06 September 2010 - 09:25 AM
#6
Posted 06 September 2010 - 12:15 PM
Which stupid company is this? Have you tried yuo take the bus and been refused yet? Id just love that one! Does this mean that all kids buggies have to be crash tested as well then?
#7
Posted 06 September 2010 - 01:34 PM
Experiance our roller coaster bus ride for free in 2012
#8
Posted 06 September 2010 - 01:36 PM
Whether the bus driver would let you on there with a crash tested chair is another matter. I would assume it would still need to be properly tied down??
#9
Posted 06 September 2010 - 03:06 PM
#10
Posted 06 September 2010 - 03:17 PM
I think if it's been crash tested, it should have a CE mark.
However, crash testing only mean's the chair will survive certain stresses, it does not give an indication of the survivability of an accident by the person in the chair.
http://www.dft.gov.u...upan6168?page=4
Simon.
#11
Posted 06 September 2010 - 03:25 PM
Thats why there is no sencible answer to this point oh wise one
#12
Posted 06 September 2010 - 10:49 PM
Its hard enough to hail a black cab when you are in a wheelchair. What are the chances if, in addition to the extra time it takes us to get in, the cabby has to check the wheelchair type, model, and compare it with his "acceptable" list. It just adds to the reasons to be ignored because he "didn't see" us.
#13
Posted 07 September 2010 - 12:06 AM
Well then my dh reminded me that my chair in fact has been thoroughly 'crash' tested. (came by my screen name honestly for sure)
I was the crash 'dummy' as it were. ROFL I crashed into walls/support beams that help the house stay up. Tables, thought was in low----pulling up to the table and SMOOOSSSSHHH right up against the whole dag gum table. We have had to replace I am not sure how many door facings from me misjudging the openings and angles. And the list could go on and on!!
So you can put the perm-mobile down as thoroughly tested and found to be safe---well not safe from ME but safe over-all!!
HUGS
Crash Carson
#14
Posted 07 September 2010 - 08:18 AM
#15
Posted 07 September 2010 - 08:30 PM
from what i understand it means more their suitability for being strapped down, but then surely that varies from the diffrent makes of clamps and the how good the person is at clamping it correctly in the first place, i travelled on this bus in my manual chair and with great difficulty transfered into a seat, my mum and 2yr old nephew were with us, nephew was placed in child seat, but his buggy and my manual chair were left completly loose in the bus not even a bunge to hold them!! then on the way home they forgot to put a child seat in so my 2yr old nephew was also not strapped in for the return journey and infact sat on my knee!! also my assistance dog was only attatched to a seat belt because i insisted he was they dont usually strap assistance dogs in i'm told, mine weighs as much as an adult so could do a lot of damage to himself and others if catapulted forwards in the event of sudden hard braking etc, not to meantion injuries to himself, yet it was fine to have a 7 1/2 stone dog loose in the bus according to them!! so much for their saftey measures!!
if i find out any more will let you know
This post has been edited by wheelywendy: 07 September 2010 - 08:38 PM
#16
Posted 07 September 2010 - 08:56 PM
#17
Posted 08 September 2010 - 02:44 AM
#18
Posted 14 September 2010 - 11:25 AM
http://www.rcsservic...y%20Systems.pdf
best of luck
you will be shocked at the results like i was
#19
Posted 10 October 2010 - 12:31 AM
in all this time I have only ever known one fatality arising from a collision and this was where a car pulled out of a side road directly in front of one of our buses. Sadly, the driver and passenger assistant were very complacent in their ways. the wheelchair was firmly secured, the seatbelt, however, was not.
The seatbelt used at the time was akin to a racing harness, with four anchor points securing a complete lap belt and two shoulder straps. the lapo and shoulder straps were not adjusted to suit the user.
As a consequence, when the bus stopped, the person in the wheelchair carried on at 30mph until they eventually hit the limits of the belts, at which point they would have stopped & dropped to the floor.
Rotarymotion, the chances of being involved in a serious accident are just as high - maybe higher. Because despite the fact that I drive at the posted speed limit, nobody can bear the thought of driving ever so slowly behind me - consequently, you would be amazed at the number of cars pulling out at the last second & forcing me to brake. You might be the number 1 driver in the world but everyone else on the roads is a nutter, and that's how you have to drive, you have to assume that everyone else has not passed a driving test.
There have been other reported accidents on our buses & the passengers survived but sustained injuries from their seatbelts fortunately, these were not life-threatening.
The subject of crash-testing is interesting because all transporters of wheelchairs should be using some sort of tie-down system - in the case of public buses, they tend to get away with it because of their constant stop-start - but I have seen how fast some of these idiots drive, even past my house, way over the posted limit. On these buses, they are supposed to have fold up seats where they can reverse the wheelchair into place & your brakes should hold you there - yeah, right. Whereas I have to spend a few minutes attaching four clamps, tensioning the straps (and I make sure the straps 'sing') and putting on the inertia lap/diagonal belt.
We are aware that many local taxi firms - although happy to transport chairs, rarely clamp them in, they simply reply on the chair being pinned between a seat and door!!!
We are constantly asking people to report these compainies but nobody wants to cause a fuss - mainly because these taxis are cheap!
The reason for crashtesting is really twofold - firstly, a good solid chair will stand up to being restrained (the cheapo chairs just bend) and secondly, if clamped correctly, it will stay firm & not fly around the vehicle causing more damage as it flies by in the event of an accident.
As for lists of acceptable chairs, I have a slightly out of date list at work but now all our referrals come through 'special needs transport' who look at the chair & check on their list. If it is OK, they issue a passport, a small green tag, which is attached to the chair - so all local companies benefit from this system as well.
By the way, if you want to make up little stickers to get a non-suitable chair clamped in, do go ahead, and while your at it, why not pick away some of the stitching to the seat of the chair & perhaps loosen off your brakes a little?
#20
Posted 10 October 2010 - 02:54 PM
#21
Posted 10 October 2010 - 10:00 PM
Rossi-46, on 14 September 2010 - 11:25 AM, said:
http://www.rcsservic...y%20Systems.pdf
best of luck
you will be shocked at the results like i was
thanks Rossi, very interesting and eyeopening, but no longer have a power chair as electrical surge has blown my electrics and they cant get the controller to reprogramme, had a quote for £900 to try to repair but not worth it on an old chair, was in great condition as hadnt been used by previous owner just stood for 5yrs but not worth reparing as parts no longer available for it
#22
Posted 14 October 2010 - 05:32 PM
The list is from Unwins, they produce the catalogue - I cannot find it anywhere on their website - although there is talk about manufacturers attaching a passport to chairs so everyone can quickly see if one is suitable for clamping. maybe if user groups approached Unwins for access to their master copy? We probably got our copy when we bought loads of clamping systems?
#23
Posted 14 October 2010 - 06:09 PM
dangerousdave, on 06 September 2010 - 01:34 PM, said:
Experiance our roller coaster bus ride for free in 2012
Sounds like fun! I want to ride one of those busses.
#24
Posted 14 October 2010 - 09:12 PM
Apparelyzed, on 06 September 2010 - 03:17 PM, said:
I think if it's been crash tested, it should have a CE mark.
However, crash testing only mean's the chair will survive certain stresses, it does not give an indication of the survivability of an accident by the person in the chair.
http://www.dft.gov.u...upan6168?page=4
Simon.
The way we see it is that the clamps we use (Unwins) are designed to hold the chair as firmly as if it were a standard bus seat. I'm a bit of a safety freak - I take my responsibility over my passengers very seriously. when those clamps are secured to the chair I like to pull back with one hand whilst tightening the strap with the other - so it strains the heck out of the chair - but it is designed to be clamped. As I said before, I like my clamps (the webbing) to 'sing' when I twang it.
When i stand up from applying the clamps I also like to give the chair a good pull to ensure it does not move - in any direction.
In fact, the only p[roblem I have ever encountered was with a recent new chair on the market, the tyres are so soft that on cornering, the solid tyre can come off the rim!!!
And talking of cornering, my wheelchair passengers are far more comfortable than 'able-bodied' as they have the arms of the chair to support. But I digress. the 'survivability' of the occupant should be equal to that of any other passenger as the system we use incorporates a lap/diaganol inertia belt on the rear clamps. Where an occupant has limited upper body support, they would most likely be wearing some sort of support vest which utilises the chair's backrest to prevent the person moving forwards or sideways (usually held together with loads of velcro) so this should add to the effectiveness.
As for travelling on 'normal' buses, sadly, their drivers are not trained to the same standards we are, they just have to get round the route on time - which often means hitting a bad corner at max speed or accellerating away from a bus stop before the passenger has even sat down - and they don't care if you are in a wheelchair, are elderly or heavilly pregnant, they treat us all with equal contempt
#25
Posted 15 October 2010 - 10:37 AM
#26
Posted 16 October 2010 - 08:30 AM
All I have seen is a handful of 'kneeling' buses (the front end can be lowered flush with a kerb) and ONE seat which folds up (so the wheelchair is pushed back tight into the seat) and the occupant travels backwards, holding on for grim death.
so, really, in a way, wheelchair occupants have some equality in that they are free to fall out of their seats just like all other passengers
That said, it has been good for local taxi firms as they are now buying more and more wheelchair accessible taxis, the downside of this is that they charge a b
#27
Posted 30 November 2010 - 04:39 PM
...........................yes they accept that the aldersley has been crash tested but guess what?!!!!!!......
.......................they wont let me on the bus with it as it hasnt been crash tested with the same make of tiedowns that they use!!!!!!!!!!! so determingd to regain acess to the bus i offered to get my carer to help me transfer from the chair to a seat so i wasnt travelling in my chair, they are happy for me to do that!!! but only on the condition my electric chair is then taken off the bus and transported in another vechile!! as they wont allow my chairs to stay on the bus!! so basically i can travel without a chair!!!!! maybe my carers supposed to carry me around town!!
it gets even better, i've requested a list of what chairs they are willing to transport but i'm told i have to buy a chair then check if its aproved by them as they are unable and unwilling to reccomed any particular chairs!!!! and i'm also told that the list is regularly reveiwed and subject to change!! so basically if u was lucky enough to find a chair they would carry it is always possible that a few months down the line it could be on their not accepted list!!! get the feeling they only want walking disabled and pensioners on this service???????!!!!!!!!!
#28
Posted 30 November 2010 - 05:27 PM
wheelywendy, on 30 November 2010 - 04:39 PM, said:
...........................yes they accept that the aldersley has been crash tested but guess what?!!!!!!......
.......................they wont let me on the bus with it as it hasnt been crash tested with the same make of tiedowns that they use!!!!!!!!!!! so determingd to regain acess to the bus i offered to get my carer to help me transfer from the chair to a seat so i wasnt travelling in my chair, they are happy for me to do that!!! but only on the condition my electric chair is then taken off the bus and transported in another vechile!! as they wont allow my chairs to stay on the bus!! so basically i can travel without a chair!!!!! maybe my carers supposed to carry me around town!!
it gets even better, i've requested a list of what chairs they are willing to transport but i'm told i have to buy a chair then check if its aproved by them as they are unable and unwilling to reccomed any particular chairs!!!! and i'm also told that the list is regularly reveiwed and subject to change!! so basically if u was lucky enough to find a chair they would carry it is always possible that a few months down the line it could be on their not accepted list!!! get the feeling they only want walking disabled and pensioners on this service???????!!!!!!!!!
That is absurd. It sounds as though someone is being deliberately obstructive, and that the threat of litigation may be your only solution. Why not have a chat with your local Citizens Advice Bureau.
#29
Posted 30 November 2010 - 08:41 PM
#30
Posted 01 December 2010 - 07:37 PM

Help




















