It's Part Of Me
#32
Posted 10 November 2011 - 04:11 PM
style71, on 07 November 2011 - 04:49 AM, said:
Personally, I never transfer simply because most restaurant chairs are too hard on my back. Having swing-away foot rests makes it do-able. I can see where some might prefer to transfer. And if someone insisted on moving my chair, I think I'd just find another place to eat.
#33
Posted 14 November 2011 - 09:20 AM
style71, on 07 November 2011 - 04:49 AM, said:
No but surely the person your with would!!
Anyway I have had my chair moved to the side and out of my reach before, but its never bothered me, I just got on with conversation and ate the food, and then who ever I was with, moved it back for me!
#34
Posted 14 November 2011 - 09:40 AM
#35
Posted 14 November 2011 - 11:19 AM
paul1404, on 14 November 2011 - 09:40 AM, said:
I like your angle, get on with it, and have a laugh at the same time wherever you can!
#37
Posted 15 November 2011 - 02:45 AM
#38
Posted 15 November 2011 - 04:49 AM
I'm sorry that many of you cannot relate with me on how my wheelchair is part of me; it is my ability to move independently. My problem with having it taken from me in a situation like the restaurant setting has little to do with the actual "what ifs" that may happen and more to do with respecting the autonomy of the person using the chair.
Of course no one is going to purposely not get my chair in the face of an emergency. But I have been in circumstances where all hell has broken loose, and let me tell you; all common logic goes out the window. I don't want to ever even be in the position of hoping that someone else does the right thing; or that someone else doesn't forget; in the face of such chaos. Especially for something as basic as determining my ability to move.
*and I never did have the question answered: if I chose to stay in my chair in the first place, how would my wheelchair have been any less of an "obstruction" to this restaurant? If anything, me getting out of it caused the restaurant to endure less obstruction from my chair due to the fact that I could fold it up and pull it in very close to me.
#39
Posted 15 November 2011 - 10:49 AM
But as has already been mentioned, if the situation should occur again, and the chairs are movable, have them put *their* chair out the back.
#40
Posted 15 November 2011 - 12:59 PM
A trophy guy, on 15 November 2011 - 04:49 AM, said:
I'm sorry that many of you cannot relate with me on how my wheelchair is part of me; it is my ability to move independently. My problem with having it taken from me in a situation like the restaurant setting has little to do with the actual "what ifs" that may happen and more to do with respecting the autonomy of the person using the chair.
Of course no one is going to purposely not get my chair in the face of an emergency. But I have been in circumstances where all hell has broken loose, and let me tell you; all common logic goes out the window. I don't want to ever even be in the position of hoping that someone else does the right thing; or that someone else doesn't forget; in the face of such chaos. Especially for something as basic as determining my ability to move.
*and I never did have the question answered: if I chose to stay in my chair in the first place, how would my wheelchair have been any less of an "obstruction" to this restaurant? If anything, me getting out of it caused the restaurant to endure less obstruction from my chair due to the fact that I could fold it up and pull it in very close to me.
Question 1 who's making the fuss
Answer You! 5 points
Question 2 obstruction in a restaurant
Answer because you can move it if needed 5 points
I ll paraphrase I might need my wheelchair handy in case of hell braking lose well why not keep it handy under your arse. If every body took your attitude an establishment could end up with many wheelchairs and scooters all over the place.
Edited by paul1404, 15 November 2011 - 01:19 PM.
#42
Posted 15 November 2011 - 07:34 PM
Paul, I would only hope that any establishments would ever have wheelchairs and scooters "all over the place". In order for that to be reality, more and more disabled folks need to feel comfortable and welcomed out and about in the world.
Now if there were ever wheelchairs and scooters "all over the place" in a restaraunt or bar or whatever, the fact of whether or not these disabled people are actually sitting in these pieces of equipment would truly be irrelevant. They would be in the restaraunt, one way or another, so if they chose to get out of their ambulatory-assistive devices, it wouldn't impact the "obstructiveness" (heavy emphasis on the quotes) of those devices one way or another.
#43
Posted 20 November 2011 - 01:46 AM
But like you, if a restaurant acted like that, I would have a serious problem with it unless it is very obviously obstructing a corridor.
Edited by Priority Seatin, 20 November 2011 - 01:46 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users




Top








