How Do You Prefer Others Identify
#31
Posted 20 December 2011 - 10:31 AM
#33
Posted 20 December 2011 - 09:19 PM
To be honest, we all have our issues to bear associated with our individual injuries, the explanation is given simply to help others comprehend our personal situations.
Explaining our injury doesn't help the pain, but it may help give an insight to our individual worlds.
Simon
#34
Posted 20 December 2011 - 09:43 PM
Apparelyzed, on 20 December 2011 - 09:19 PM, said:
To be honest, we all have our issues to bear associated with our individual injuries, the explanation is given simply to help others comprehend our personal situations.
Explaining our injury doesn't help the pain, but it may help give an insight to our individual worlds.
Simon
It really was meant verrrrrry light heartedyly!!
I do agree!
You get two "spinal injuries" of the same level whos bodies react totally differently!
As Simon says being sensory incomplee is incredibly useful to me!!
#38
Posted 21 December 2011 - 07:16 PM
Kwag_Myers, on 21 December 2011 - 07:04 PM, said:
btw, "incomplete" is synonymous with "probably a walker".
I actually rarely, if ever, think that when I read incomplete.
#39
Posted 21 December 2011 - 07:28 PM
Kwag_Myers, on 21 December 2011 - 07:04 PM, said:
btw, "incomplete" is synonymous with "probably a walker".
I think that's a generalization that I have a big problem with!
I'm far from "probably a walker" and I bet that there are a few more here like me too.
Given the topic of this thread I cannot agree with you Identifying us that way.
#40
Posted 21 December 2011 - 07:51 PM
Kwag_Myers, on 21 December 2011 - 07:04 PM, said:
btw, "incomplete" is synonymous with "probably a walker".
I also have found that "Incomplete" rarely means probably a walker. I learned that early on when I first identified as Incomplete...then met EC, Mellowgator, Stillfingers, Isobar....etc. I then changed my status to my syndrome and walking status.
As my level solidified I changed my status to reflect where I have been deemed to have most issues...that's my choice. I like to make myself easy to find for others in a similar boat.
#41
Posted 21 December 2011 - 07:58 PM
lavenderthistle, on 21 December 2011 - 07:51 PM, said:
Kwag_Myers, on 21 December 2011 - 07:04 PM, said:
btw, "incomplete" is synonymous with "probably a walker".
I also have found that "Incomplete" rarely means probably a walker. I learned that early on when I first identified as Incomplete...then met EC, Mellowgator, Stillfingers, Isobar....etc. I then changed my status to my syndrome and walking status.
As my level solidified I changed my status to reflect where I have been deemed to have most issues...that's my choice. I like to make myself easy to find for others in a similar boat.
I must say Dear Lav that you cover this perfectly and to be honest the medical definition of our injury may not convey the message you want to send when identifying your injury on here. I think you have explained your choice clearly and it fulfills it's purpose very well.
#42
Posted 21 December 2011 - 08:01 PM
energy expenditure, the extent of orthotic support needed, and patient motivation will determine the outcome. Functional
electrical stimulation and other new orthotic designs have not notably increased the number of persons able to walk after a
spinal injury. Rehabilitation professionals can use patient education, illustrating relearning to walk with examples of
infants' and toddlers' progress, to assist patients in understanding their abilities and limitations. The final decision on
ambulation and orthotic prescriptions can be made in stages after a patient adjusts to a wheelchair-independent level.
(Subbarao JV: Walking after spinal cord injury-Goal or wish? In Rehabilitation Medicine-Adding Life to Years [Special Issue]. West J Med 1991
I'd guess it's better now...sure hope it is!
Edited by StillFingers, 21 December 2011 - 08:09 PM.
Shooting With Still Fingers - http://shootingwiths...s.blogspot.com/
#44
Posted 21 December 2011 - 09:49 PM
Edinburgh Colin, on 21 December 2011 - 07:28 PM, said:
Kwag_Myers, on 21 December 2011 - 07:04 PM, said:
I think that's a generalization that I have a big problem with!
I'm far from "probably a walker" and I bet that there are a few more here like me too.
Given the topic of this thread I cannot agree with you Identifying us that way.
Oh, and I did say "probably", as opposed to "absolutely". My point is, the word "incomplete" should indicate the possibility exists. I don't understand why someone would come after lavenderthistle for being a walker when it clearly states "Inc" below her name.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users





Top










