Bone Loss From Not Standing Regularly?
#2
Posted 14 January 2012 - 06:28 AM
Edit: Some experts say that a standing frame doesn't even help bone density.
Edited by Beautiful, 14 January 2012 - 06:31 AM.
#3
Posted 14 January 2012 - 06:31 AM
BoyFallDown, on 14 January 2012 - 06:11 AM, said:
#4
Posted 14 January 2012 - 06:47 AM
Beautiful, on 14 January 2012 - 06:28 AM, said:
Edit: Some experts say that a standing frame doesn't even help bone density.
A trophy guy, on 14 January 2012 - 06:31 AM, said:
BoyFallDown, on 14 January 2012 - 06:11 AM, said:
Well, that sucks. All the rehab nurses told me it was essential. Is it worth it to take a multivitamin that is high in calcium? Thanks for the info
Also, sorry to go off topic but how do you stay in such great shape trophy guy? I used to powerlift and do spinclass before my accident, now I'm not sure how to keep my weight under control.
Edited by BoyFallDown, 14 January 2012 - 06:50 AM.
#5
Posted 14 January 2012 - 07:19 AM
BoyFallDown, on 14 January 2012 - 06:47 AM, said:
Beautiful, on 14 January 2012 - 06:28 AM, said:
Edit: Some experts say that a standing frame doesn't even help bone density.
A trophy guy, on 14 January 2012 - 06:31 AM, said:
BoyFallDown, on 14 January 2012 - 06:11 AM, said:
Well, that sucks. All the rehab nurses told me it was essential. Is it worth it to take a multivitamin that is high in calcium? Thanks for the info
Also, sorry to go off topic but how do you stay in such great shape trophy guy? I used to powerlift and do spinclass before my accident, now I'm not sure how to keep my weight under control.
The research that has found the ineffectiveness of static, or passive, standing on the improvement (or stability) of bone density is relatively new; so perhaps the nurses simply weren't aware of this information. I used a standing chair myself for about 4 years before I found this out. As far as the calcium supplement, yes, that is a very good idea. That and a Vitamin D supplement (although there is doubt as to how well supplemental forms of these vitamins and minerals are absorbed). Also, of course, eat lots of calcium and vitamin-D rich foods (this is the best way for your body to get the nutrients).
Thank you for the compliment about my shape. As far as "how I do it", it's too much to try to explain each and every thing that I do and eat; it's more of a lifestyle that I've adopted and honed over the years. I talk about it (more than some would probably care to hear, I'm sure) in many threads there, so if you ever have a specific question feel free to ask.
*ETA: The picture of me in my profile is a competition photo, so I am in pre-contest shape and all tanned up. I don't look like that everyday.
Edited by A trophy guy, 14 January 2012 - 07:22 AM.
#6
Posted 14 January 2012 - 08:27 AM
FES exercise is the only way I know of reducing significantly bone loss / reduced bone density
Edited by russ1, 14 January 2012 - 08:28 AM.
#7
Posted 14 January 2012 - 12:21 PM
Maybe you could have one made. I don't think it'd be to hard for someone that knows woodworking.
Edited by Bethann, 14 January 2012 - 02:42 PM.
#8
Posted 14 January 2012 - 02:25 PM
If FES is a no go then possibly try the steps thing as force will be exerted going up the step if you give it some welly? I will ask my source where the article is and add to the post if it helps.
Standing is good for stretching muscles and internal organs so that bowel and bladder can get the stretch which is essential to maintain optimal health and I do it daily but my standing frame came as part of my post hospital discharge package. I now have a standing wheelchair to enable me to use my regular kitchen which is not adapted so I get to stand doing day to day chores and is IMO worth the investment.
Broc
http://sportsmedicin...iseandBones.htm high impact exercise increases bone density - up and down steps, is something a fitness instructor told me, or weightlifting, as per this internet article, are things that may help folks restricted to chairs but who have the ability to do so.
Edited by brockit79, 15 January 2012 - 09:47 AM.
#9
Posted 14 January 2012 - 02:57 PM
-----
The effect of remobilization on spinal cord injury–induced osteoporosis has been fairly well studied. Weight-bearing exercises with standing frames and bikes, using forms of functional electrical stimulation (FES), have been shown to be effective when started within 6 weeks of injury. However, these same programs in the population with chronic spinal cord injury are ineffective in preventing osteoporosis or restoring bone mineral. (FES-induced lower extremity cycling has not been shown to increase bone density in the hip parameters of patients with chronic injury.)
Changes occur rapidly in the skeleton of a patient with spinal cord injury (SCI), and interventions must be undertaken quickly. The fact that there are no effective treatments to restore bone mineral once it has been lost makes early treatment even more imperative. Thus, early prevention is the main focus in treating spinal cord injury–induced osteoporosis.
Spinal cord injury causes immediate and, in some regions, permanent gravitational unloading. The result is a disuse structural change with associated metabolic consequences. Hypercalciuria is seen by 10 days following the spinal cord injury and reaches a peak 1-6 months postinjury. This level of hypercalciuria is 2-4 times that of persons without spinal cord injury who undergo prolonged bed rest.
Rapid loss of bone mineral occurs during the first 4 months following spinal cord injury. In patients with spinal cord injury, less than 1 year following the injury, reduction in bone mineral densities (BMDs) has been noted in the femoral neck (27%), midshaft (25%), and distal femur (43%), as compared with controls.
By 10 years postinjury, over 50% of bone content in these regions has been demineralized. The arms and trunk demonstrate an increase in bone content after the 4-month point. This gain in mineral content over the next 10-year period helps to offset some of the initial losses in the arms. The net effect is an approximate 10-21% loss of bone at the 10-year point. Interestingly, the trunk has a net gain in mineral content by 12 years postinjury.
Paraplegia vs tetraplegia
Significant differences in upper extremity bone density are observed between paraplegic patients and tetraplegic patients. The BMD of the arms of paraplegic patients returns to near normal by the 10-year postinjury point, which is approximately 16% more bone mineral than is found in the arms of tetraplegic patients.
Complete vs incomplete SCI
Individuals with complete injuries tend to have less BMD than those with incomplete lesions. With complete lesions, significantly lower lumbar spine BMDs have been noted (z value -1.47) in patients 1-26 years postinjury. In addition, individuals with incomplete motor spinal cord injury demonstrate greater BMD at the areas of greater lower extremity muscle strength.
Spasticity vs flaccidity
Some controversy exists surrounding the protective effect of spasticity on bone mineral content. Studies have found a decrease in losses of bone density in patients exhibiting spasticity, compared with the flaccid group.
Source: http://emedicine.med...204-overview#a1
#11
Posted 14 January 2012 - 09:55 PM
russ1, on 14 January 2012 - 08:27 AM, said:
I just wanted to re-iterate what Russ said, calcium supplements can increase your risk of bladder and/or kidney stones and this can cause a whole range or problems
a "normal" diet should have enough calcium to meet your bodies requirements. If you don't eat dairy then you may have some problems but you should really discuss any calcium supplementation with your sci dr to be on the safe side
Memento Vivere
Memento Mori
#12
Posted 14 January 2012 - 11:00 PM
Since, I think I read somewhere, the body produces this vitamin in the presence of sunlight,, the fact that many of us don't get out into it enough,, might have some bearing. I could be wrong about this,,, but if I google it now,, I'd have to retype all this.
ed
Well,, I went to Wiki,, and I'm okay with the sunshine thing,,, but the amount to take was wrong,, by a lot, apparrantly. I checked my pill bottle,, and it's in IUs,, not mg s,, quite a difference.
As usual,, be a bit wary of what you read here,,, some of us ( me) are idiots.
ed
Edited by edlee, 14 January 2012 - 11:14 PM.
#13
Posted 14 January 2012 - 11:32 PM
Good luck.
___________
Life's tough. It's even tougher if you're stupid!_ _John Wayne
#14
Posted 15 January 2012 - 09:46 AM
Edited by brockit79, 15 January 2012 - 09:48 AM.
#15
Posted 15 January 2012 - 05:09 PM
From a professional point of view I just wanted to say that those of you who say that standing doesn't reduce bone loss are quite correct. The more research that has been done into this the more it has been shown that it is the vibration associated with exercise that assists with maintaining bone mineral density and therefore a static stand in a frame will not offer this. This is partly why things such as the vibro-gyms have been developed and now research is slowly getting underway to look at their accessibility for those with SCI.
However, standing does have other positive effects:
The weight-bearing through the long bones provides the best possible stretch for the lower limb muscles, partly because you have your body weight behind the stretch but also, due to the nature of the activity (i.e. standing for a prolonged period of time), the stretch is maintained for much longer. This can have a very good effect on lower limb and trunk spasms and many patients of mine have reported a lasting effect from hours to 2 or 3 days.
Getting out of a seated position regularly will also help with pressure relief and prevention of contractures - it's very good to vary your position as much as possible to ward off any adaptive muscle length changes that may ultimately impact on your functioning.
The effect of gravity can also help with things like bladder and bowel function and, finally, research has suggested that many people have a psychological benefit from standing.
If you have not stood for a long time it would be advisable to re-start under the supervision of an experienced physiotherapist though. They will need to check the alignment in your lower limbs and monitor your blood pressure response to ensure that you do it safely.
Hope this helps folks!
www.sci-services.co.uk
www.sci-services.co.uk
#16
Posted 15 January 2012 - 05:28 PM
Drink your Ovaltine (:
#18
Posted 15 January 2012 - 07:19 PM
Vanessamaee, on 15 January 2012 - 05:28 PM, said:
Drink your Ovaltine (:
Hi Ness
Welcome back!
It is hypothesised that the FES rower, note I say rower and not bike (very important to note), helps with bone density as it is the type of exercise and not the electrical stimulation that helps with bone density. At this stage no promises will be made until all the fabulous positive things from rowing are proven. sorry, I get very excited and forget that this machine has not yet completed the rigorous testing essential for such boastings just yet. All in good time though I'm sure of it! Go team FES ROWING WOOOO.
until then I'm on the Ovaltine! I love the stuff
Broc
Edited by brockit79, 15 January 2012 - 07:41 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




Top










