Mxcrash
Thinking Out Loud
#1
Posted 03 April 2007 - 12:22 AM
Mxcrash
#3
Posted 03 April 2007 - 07:25 AM
is a snake disabled because it has no legs or are humans disabled because they cant slither up a tree . are fish disabled because they cant live out of water or are humans who cant breathe underwater
i find in my day to day life i would do more than most so called ab's everyone has somthing which they can do better than most & some things which they just cant do . i say if being perfect phisically & mentally is abled then everyone has a dissability just some stand out more than otherd
#4
Posted 03 April 2007 - 08:34 AM
"non legitimus carborundum"
#5
Posted 03 April 2007 - 07:44 PM
But, then, not being on the politically correct bandwagon, I personly don't care if they call me a cripple. Other people's descriptive terms and attitudes don't bother me at all. If you are confident and comfortable with who and what you are, nothing anyone can say will affect that. If you aren't then you are the one who needs an attitude adjustment.
#6
Posted 03 April 2007 - 11:09 PM
Some of the logic was interesting. There were people who would rip apart a person who called them crippled but their nickname within the family was crippled mama or something. Some would go out in public and their friends would pretend to be cruel to them and call them crippled or something and they would have a good laugh.
The bottom line is we all have different opinions as to what is an appropriate term. Even so, many SCI's with the exact same injury expected the public at large be educated regarding how to address them. That's an impossible task when even I am not sure how to refer to someone with the exact same injury as mine without offending him or her!
One more thing. It is interesting that both deej and edlee prefer the word handicapped. I used to have a quote in my signature with the word handicapped. I received a pm from an offended member. The origin of the word was where the offense lied. Apparently, the bums who sat on the sidewalks, back in the early 1900s I believe, used to hold out their caps with their hand to beg for change. So it kind of evolved from hand to cap to handicap. That is the essence of what I was told and may not be completely accurate.
I really don't care what term is used as long as it is not intended to offend. I'm sure disabled will fall by the wayside (the terms physically challenged and differently abled are grabbing hold) and there will be a new term to use for a while. Then another discussion like this will keep the cycle going.
Brett
Morality, like art, means drawing a line someplace. --Oscar Wilde
#7
Posted 04 April 2007 - 11:59 AM
MX Crash, on Apr 3 2007, 12:22 AM, said:
Mxcrash
It really depends on what you are trying to describe. If you are describing the loss of function, pain and all the personal physical effects of SCI then personally I prefer IMPAIRMENT.
"My Spinal Cord Injury has left me with a PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT."
Currently there is no solution to "cure" that impairment.
How ever if you are describing the experience of being somone with a PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT who lives in a world designed, organised and controlled to suit the needs of a majority. Then I prefer the term DISABLED. Used in the same way as DISenfranchised, DISempowered, DISadvantaged. Much of what I cannot do (in terms of leading an ordinary life) are difficult or impossible because of lack of access, stereotyping, organisational and other barriers placed in my way.
"The way society is organised makes me a DISABLED PERSON."
There IS a cure for this and it is polictical and social change.
I may always have an IMPAIRMENT, I need not always be DISABLED.
Terms like Challenged, Handicapable, Special Needs, dis ABLED, Differently Abled just miss the point.
It is not our difference that makes our life difficult it is societys reaction to that difference.
Tom
Never grow old, never die young.
#8
Posted 04 April 2007 - 04:52 PM
Tinbasher, on Apr 4 2007, 11:59 AM, said:
MX Crash, on Apr 3 2007, 12:22 AM, said:
Mxcrash
It really depends on what you are trying to describe. If you are describing the loss of function, pain and all the personal physical effects of SCI then personally I prefer IMPAIRMENT.
"My Spinal Cord Injury has left me with a PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT."
Currently there is no solution to "cure" that impairment.
How ever if you are describing the experience of being somone with a PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT who lives in a world designed, organised and controlled to suit the needs of a majority. Then I prefer the term DISABLED. Used in the same way as DISenfranchised, DISempowered, DISadvantaged. Much of what I cannot do (in terms of leading an ordinary life) are difficult or impossible because of lack of access, stereotyping, organisational and other barriers placed in my way.
"The way society is organised makes me a DISABLED PERSON."
There IS a cure for this and it is polictical and social change.in
I may always have an IMPAIRMENT, I need not always be DISABLED.
Terms like Challenged, Handicapable, Special Needs, dis ABLED, Differently Abled just miss the point.
It is not our difference that makes our life difficult it is societys reaction to that difference.
Tom
Mxcrash
Tinbasher, on Apr 4 2007, 11:59 AM, said:
MX Crash, on Apr 3 2007, 12:22 AM, said:
Mxcrash
It really depends on what you are trying to describe. If you are describing the loss of function, pain and all the personal physical effects of SCI then personally I prefer IMPAIRMENT.
"My Spinal Cord Injury has left me with a PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT."
Currently there is no solution to "cure" that impairment.
How ever if you are describing the experience of being somone with a PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT who lives in a world designed, organised and controlled to suit the needs of a majority. Then I prefer the term DISABLED. Used in the same way as DISenfranchised, DISempowered, DISadvantaged. Much of what I cannot do (in terms of leading an ordinary life) are difficult or impossible because of lack of access, stereotyping, organisational and other barriers placed in my way.
"The way society is organised makes me a DISABLED PERSON."
There IS a cure for this and it is polictical and social change.in
I may always have an IMPAIRMENT, I need not always be DISABLED.
Terms like Challenged, Handicapable, Special Needs, dis ABLED, Differently Abled just miss the point.
It is not our difference that makes our life difficult it is societys reaction to that difference.
Tom
Mxcrash
#9
Posted 04 April 2007 - 05:09 PM
I guess I am disabled, in that there are, whether I like it or not, things I can no longer do or not do as an able bodied person can.
Disabled takes into account, I think, the way a 'normal' person can function and I do not function that way any more.
So yeah, i guess i am disabled...I don't know but 'physially challenged' does not really strike me as the term I could identify with, even though, yes, it is a challenge to live with SCI.
The term handicapped (Behindert in german) is ok to use to, when I introduce myself I find i use this word more than any other to describe my impairment.
maybe because it I have always used it, before I was injured or i don't know...it just does not bother me anymore because yes i am handicapped and more handicapped in everday things than I am being 'challenged'.
Just my two cents...
#11
Posted 04 April 2007 - 09:53 PM
Dancingdolphin, on Apr 4 2007, 12:48 PM, said:
Now if that's not putting a positve spin on a negative term, I don't know what is!
Morality, like art, means drawing a line someplace. --Oscar Wilde
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




Top








