russ1, on Sep 10 2008, 01:03 PM, said:
. . . not many countries have public service broadcasting like we're fortunate enough to have . . .
. . . there's just not enough interest in the paralympics . . .
. . . it's down to the very confusing class systems and ratings coupled with the fact that there's about 9 or 10 gold medals in most events . . .
I'm watching it on satellite, not public service tv. Some bean counter has obviously done the maths and determined that it's worthwhile. Why would it be financially viable in Africa, and Oz, but not in the USA or UK? I would have thought it was the other way around?
There's not much interest in most non-mainstream sports. We have grid-iron, bowls, horse jumping, snooker, rally driving, Oz touring car racing, etc on our satellite channels. Very, very few people watch, but they're there nonetheless. Olympic sports are by nature not "popular". How many people watch men's javelin throwing during the year, or women's 25m pistol shooting?
I've been watching the Paralympics for almost a week now, and I've only ever seen 3 medals awarded for each event (one gold, one silver, and one bronze). If you're talking about the different classifications then you're maybe being a little harsh, I mean, even the Olympics has the same events in different forms (i.e. 400m, 400m hurdles, 400m relay, and then the same again for men/women).
Too many folk get themselves tied up with the classifications, etc . . . just enjoy it for the pleasure of enjoying it . . . in the same way I thoroughly enjoy the Tour de France, yet I have never sat on a bicycle in my life. Even if you've just arrived in from Mars you have to have respect for a guy with no lower legs who can run the 100m in 11 seconds . . . or a backstroke swimmer with no arms who grips a towel in her teeth to support herself before kicking off.